Digital SAT Reading and Writing Practice Question #623

Text 1: Proponents of integrating artificial intelligence into legal discovery processes argue that it will radically democratize access to justice. By utilizing machine learning algorithms to review millions of documents in a fraction of the time it takes human paralegals, law firms can drastically reduce billable hours. Consequently, these cost reductions will allow clients who previously could not afford top-tier representation to pursue litigation without fear of financial ruin. Text 2: The rush to implement AI in legal discovery overlooks a critical vulnerability: algorithmic opacity and a profound lack of semantic awareness. Legal documents are notoriously laden with linguistic nuance, irony, and context-dependent phrasing. Because current AI systems lack an intuitive grasp of this ambiguity, they routinely bypass crucial exculpatory evidence. Ultimately, only wealthy clients who can afford to hire human experts for supplemental review will actually benefit from reliable representation. Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the assertion in Text 1 regarding the democratization of justice?